Jump to content

Proposed college wrestling rule changes


VakAttack

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

would love to see numbers on this.

it may or may not be true... im not sure... 

I don’t have time to look up all the data… maybe @Wrestleknownothing has a chart for us 🙂 ? But a quick search shows we are headed in the right direction 

https://uww.org/article/wrestling-enjoys-record-viewership-world-champs-108-athletes-qualify-spots-olympic-games

https://uww.org/article/wrestling-scores-big-world-cships-706-percent-jump-engagements 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what does the board think about Wade Schalles' 'a point scored is a point earned' philosophy?

Wade champions this format but I don’t believe he came up with it. I’m behind most of what he suggests with some simplistic twists. Kyle and Andy broke down the results-based outcomes a few years ago on their On The Mat podcast.

If “duals don’t matter” then what’s the harm in simply changing how the team score is totaled?
  • Fire 1

Jason Bryant hasn't worked here since 2008. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, pokemonster said:

Are people really having Super Bowl-esque watch parties for NCAA wrestling? Honestly, I gave up trying to watch it live due to how much of a pain in the ass it was. Ended up finding a YouTube channel that illegally posted the matches a couple of hours later. 

I was part of a contingent of about 25 people that reserved a couple tables to watch semis at a bar…. 
 

I know there were many others. Many a HS/Club programs do big watch parties. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
  • Fire 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I was part of a contingent of about 25 people that reserved a couple tables to watch semis at a bar…. 
 

I know there were many others. Many a HS/Club programs do big watch parties. 

Sounds like a good time. Used to watch with the fam but being in the south these days, no chance of getting a group together like that. They call it "wrasslin". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Mike Parrish said:

So, what does the board think about Wade Schalles' 'a point scored is a point earned' philosophy?

I prefer a compromise, where every point matters, utilizing a Margin of Victory formula, such that winning by 3 is worth a little more than winning by 1, and winning by 10 is worth a little more than a current major.  Hoping it increases action, especially late in the match.  Still 6 for a pin, 5 for a tech...but everything else is between 3.0 and 4.4, depending on your MOV (margin of victory).  OT win only 3, while a win by 14 is 4.4 (and a win by 8 is 3.8 etc).  We already use 1/2 points in tourney scoring, and with everything computerized, unsure why the fear of a decimal is so prevalent.  Gymnastics, diving and others use decimals.  One of the best benefits is essentially eliminating the dreaded dual meet tie-breaker.  Other proposed option to increase scoring is making the base win only 2 points, adding the margin of victory (0.1 to 1.4) and also adding the points scored by the winner (0.1 up to a max of 1.5 for scoring 15 or more---keeping the range from 2.2 to 4.9).  In this case, a 10-7 win is worth 3.3, while a 3-1 win is only 2.5.  Rewards action.  And would also prefer a forfeit being 7 or 8, but that is another debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason Bryant said:

I don’t hate an MOV style (we discussed on Mat Stats), but just no no no on decimals. That isn’t something I can ever come around on.

I have to agree.

Scorers already routinely have difficulty with whole numbers.

I can't imagine just how awful the update to the Trackwrestling software would end up being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jason Bryant said:

I don’t hate an MOV style (we discussed on Mat Stats), but just no no no on decimals. That isn’t something I can ever come around on.

How do you feel about centimeters & millimeters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DJT said:

Pin=30

Tech=25

Dec=10+MOV

… though a team with 3 wins by pin could win 90-77… but aren’t we looking to emphasize/reward scoring and pinning?

seems like a reasonable compromise to appease the decimalphobes.  only concern is modifying those bulb scoreboards on the walls of so many gyms that can only handle a "1" in the hundreds place (guess they never counted on hoopsters hitting 200), so the HS dual that ends up 210 to 205 could be tough to display.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Adonis Bonar

    Creighton Prep, Nebraska
    Class of 2024
    Committed to California Baptist
    Projected Weight: 184, 197

    Billy Greenwood

    Poudre, Colorado
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Little Rock
    Projected Weight: 149

    Blase Mele

    Princeton, New Jersey
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Princeton
    Projected Weight: 149

    Owen Hendricks

    Dorman, South Carolina
    Class of 2024
    Committed to The Citadel
    Projected Weight: 165

    Vince Bouzakis

    Wyoming Seminary, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Ohio State
    Projected Weight: 157, 165
×
×
  • Create New...